AI Rate CardQwen3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni: API price and specs
MiMo-V2-Omni is 18% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price.
Qwen3.8 Flash is 24% cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni on output price.
Qwen3.8 Flash is 1% cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.8 Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.0975 +21.9% | $0.08 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.40 +166.7% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.31 | $0.40 +30.9% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.47 | $2.00 +325.5% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.16 | $0.16 +0.9% |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K +50.5% | 265K |
| Providers | 27 | 3 +88.9% |
| Regions | GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | audio, image, pdf, text, video |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | edenai | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is 18% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price. Qwen3.8 Flash is 24% cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni on output price. Qwen3.8 Flash is 1% cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Qwen3.8 Flash: 1M tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni?
aihubmix, opencode, zenmux