AI Rate Card

Qwen3.8 27B vs Llama 3.1 70B Euryale: API price and specs

Qwen3.8 27B is 95% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on input price.

Qwen3.8 27B is 62% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on output price.

Qwen3.8 27B is 90% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3.8 27B has a 762.9% larger context than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale.

FieldQwen3.8 27BLlama 3.1 70B Euryale
Lowest input, per 1M$0.039$0.85 +2079.5%
Median input, per 1M$0.40$0.85 +112.5%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.32$0.85 +165.6%
Median output, per 1M$2.50 +194.1%$0.85
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.10$1.02 +890.3%
Context1.1M131K +88.4%
Max output500K131K +73.8%
Providers485 +89.6%
RegionsAU, CH, CZ, EU, GLOBAL, USUS
Acceptsapplication/pdf, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideotext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerchutesdeepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, meganova, trustedrouter

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Euryale?

Qwen3.8 27B is 95% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on input price. Qwen3.8 27B is 62% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on output price. Qwen3.8 27B is 90% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Euryale on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Euryale?

Qwen3.8 27B: 1.1M tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Euryale: 131K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 27B and Llama 3.1 70B Euryale?

deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, meganova, trustedrouter