AI Rate Card

Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: API price and specs

Qwen3.8 27B is 48% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on input price.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 31% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on output price.

Qwen3.8 27B is 13% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3.8 27B has a 331.5% larger context than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante.

FieldQwen3.8 27BLing 3.0 Flash Sante
Lowest input, per 1M$0.039$0.075 +92.3%
Median input, per 1M$0.40 +433.3%$0.075
Lowest output, per 1M$0.32 +45.5%$0.22
Median output, per 1M$2.50 +1036.4%$0.22
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.10$0.12 +15.5%
Context1.1M262K +76.8%
Max output500K33K +93.4%
Providers485 +89.6%
RegionsAU, CH, CZ, EU, GLOBAL, US—
Acceptsapplication/pdf, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideotext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnoyes
Cheapest providerchutesnovita

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

kilo, novita, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Qwen3.8 27B is 48% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on input price. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 31% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on output price. Qwen3.8 27B is 13% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 27B or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Qwen3.8 27B: 1.1M tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 27B and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

kilo, novita, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux