Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs mimo-v2.6-pro-rl: API price and specs
mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 59% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price.
mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 27% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price.
mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 53% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | mimo-v2.6-pro-rl |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $1.05 +142.5% | $0.43 |
| Median input, per 1M | $2.00 +144.6% | $0.82 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.20 +37.9% | $0.87 |
| Median output, per 1M | $6.00 +479.7% | $1.03 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $1.29 +112.6% | $0.61 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Providers | 25 | 2 +92% |
| Regions | CN, EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | image, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | trustedrouter | huggingface |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or mimo-v2.6-pro-rl?
mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 59% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price. mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 27% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price. mimo-v2.6-pro-rl is 53% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or mimo-v2.6-pro-rl?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; mimo-v2.6-pro-rl: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and mimo-v2.6-pro-rl?
fireworks-ai, huggingface