Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: API price and specs

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 96% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 88% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Field	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Lowest input, per 1M	$1.05 +2244.4%	$0.045
Median input, per 1M	$2.00 +566.7%	$0.30
Lowest output, per 1M	$1.20 +700%	$0.15
Median output, per 1M	$6.00 +400%	$1.20
Lowest unit price	—	—
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$1.29 +1626.7%	$0.075
Context	1M	1M
Max output	262K +75%	1M
Providers	25 +58.3%	60
Regions	CN, EU, GLOBAL, US	APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US
Accepts	image, text	application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	no	yes
Cheapest provider	trustedrouter	openrouter

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, aiml, cortecs, deepinfra, edenai, fireworks-ai, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, iteracompute, jiekou, kilo, meganova, modal, novita, openrouter, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, tensorx, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 96% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 88% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?