AI Rate CardQwen3.7 Plus vs Flint: API price and specs
Qwen3.7 Plus has a 305.9% larger context than Flint.
| Field | Qwen3.7 Plus | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.23 | — |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.32 | — |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.92 | — |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.28 | — |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.41 | — |
| Context | 1.1M | 262K +75.4% |
| Max output | 262K | 236K +10% |
| Providers | 23 | 4 +82.6% |
| Regions | GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | file, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | 302ai | — |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, kenari, kilo, openrouter
Frequently asked questions
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.7 Plus or Flint?
Qwen3.7 Plus: 1.1M tokens; Flint: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.7 Plus and Flint?
aihubmix, kenari, kilo, openrouter