AI Rate CardQwen3.7 Max vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: API price and specs
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on input price.
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on output price.
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3.7 Max has a 305.9% larger context than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante.
| Field | Qwen3.7 Max | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $1.25 +1566.7% | $0.075 |
| Median input, per 1M | $2.00 +2566.7% | $0.075 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $3.75 +1604.5% | $0.22 |
| Median output, per 1M | $6.00 +2627.3% | $0.22 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $2.00 +1580.7% | $0.12 |
| Context | 1.1M | 262K +75.4% |
| Max output | 131K | 33K +75% |
| Providers | 23 | 5 +78.3% |
| Regions | GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | novita | novita |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
kilo, novita, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on input price. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on output price. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.7 Max or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?
Qwen3.7 Max: 1.1M tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.7 Max and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?
kilo, novita, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux