AI Rate Card

Qwen3.7 Max vs DeepSeek Chat: API price and specs

DeepSeek Chat is 90% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on input price.

DeepSeek Chat is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on output price.

DeepSeek Chat is 91% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3.7 Max has a 6.4% larger context than DeepSeek Chat.

FieldQwen3.7 MaxDeepSeek Chat
Lowest input, per 1M$1.25 +941.7%$0.12
Median input, per 1M$2.00 +737.9%$0.24
Lowest output, per 1M$3.75 +1239.3%$0.28
Median output, per 1M$6.00 +852.4%$0.63
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$2.00 +1036.4%$0.18
Context1.1M1M +6%
Max output131K +65.9%384K
Providers238 +65.2%
RegionsGLOBAL, USAPAC
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providernovitacometapi

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, cometapi, edenai, kilo, openrouter, orcarouter, requesty, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or DeepSeek Chat?

DeepSeek Chat is 90% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on input price. DeepSeek Chat is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on output price. DeepSeek Chat is 91% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.7 Max or DeepSeek Chat?

Qwen3.7 Max: 1.1M tokens; DeepSeek Chat: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.7 Max and DeepSeek Chat?

aiml, cometapi, edenai, kilo, openrouter, orcarouter, requesty, zenmux