AI Rate CardQwen3.6 27B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B: API price and specs
Qwen3.6 27B is 94% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on input price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 78% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on output price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 88% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.6 27B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.025 | $0.42 +1588% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.42 +5.2% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.28 | $1.27 +352.1% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.19 +152% | $1.27 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.081 | $0.68 +733.6% |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Providers | 27 | 2 +92.6% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, audio, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm | file, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | inferx | trustedrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.6 27B is 94% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on input price. Qwen3.6 27B is 78% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on output price. Qwen3.6 27B is 88% cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.6 27B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262K tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.6 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
kenari, trustedrouter