Qwen3.5 Plus vs Kimi K2.5: API price and specs
Qwen3.5 Plus is 76% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price.
Qwen3.5 Plus is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on output price.
Qwen3.5 Plus is 65% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3.5 Plus has a 281.5% larger context than Kimi K2.5.
| Field | Qwen3.5 Plus | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.11 | $0.45 +310.6% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.36 | $0.60 +66.7% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.66 | $1.20 +82.5% |
| Median output, per 1M | $2.21 | $3.00 +35.7% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.24 | $0.69 +186.2% |
| Context | 1M | 262K +73.8% |
| Max output | 66K +75% | 262K |
| Providers | 18 +52.6% | 38 |
| Regions | GLOBAL | EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/heif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/3gpp, video/avi, video/mov, video/mp4, video/mpeg, video/mpg, video/webm, video/wmv, video/x-flv |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
302ai, aihubmix, aiml, alibaba-coding-plan, alibaba-coding-plan-cn, edenai, jiekou, kilo, meganova, moark, ofox, opencode, openrouter, orcarouter, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus or Kimi K2.5?
Qwen3.5 Plus is 76% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price. Qwen3.5 Plus is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on output price. Qwen3.5 Plus is 65% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.5 Plus or Kimi K2.5?
Qwen3.5 Plus: 1M tokens; Kimi K2.5: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.5 Plus and Kimi K2.5?
302ai, aihubmix, aiml, alibaba-coding-plan, alibaba-coding-plan-cn, edenai, jiekou, kilo, meganova, moark, ofox, opencode, openrouter, orcarouter, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux