AI Rate Card

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5 4B: API price and specs

Qwen3.5 4B is 82% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on input price.

Qwen3.5 4B is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on output price.

Qwen3.5 4B is 88% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

FieldQwen3.5 397B-A17BQwen3.5 4B
Lowest input, per 1M$0.16 +448%$0.03
Median input, per 1M$0.55 +1122.2%$0.045
Lowest output, per 1M$0.99 +1309.1%$0.07
Median output, per 1M$3.60 +3172.7%$0.11
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.36 +722%$0.044
Context262K262K
Max output262K262K
Providers305 +83.3%
RegionsCH, EU, GLOBAL, USTH
Acceptsfile, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideoimage, text, video
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnoyes
Cheapest provideraihubmixdeepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

deepinfra, empiriolabs, mixlayer, requesty, trustedrouter

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Qwen3.5 4B?

Qwen3.5 4B is 82% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on input price. Qwen3.5 4B is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on output price. Qwen3.5 4B is 88% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Qwen3.5 4B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 262K tokens; Qwen3.5 4B: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Qwen3.5 4B?

deepinfra, empiriolabs, mixlayer, requesty, trustedrouter