AI Rate Card

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Apertus v1.5 70B: API price and specs

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 86% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on input price.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 68% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on output price.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 78% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a 162.1% larger context than Apertus v1.5 70B.

FieldQwen3.5 122B-A10BApertus v1.5 70B
Lowest input, per 1M$0.11$0.78 +595%
Median input, per 1M$0.26$0.82 +215.4%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.90$2.79 +210.3%
Median output, per 1M$2.20$2.92 +32.7%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.29$1.34 +358.2%
Context262K100K +61.9%
Max output262K8K +96.9%
Providers193 +84.2%
RegionsCH, EU, GLOBAL, USCH
Acceptsaudio, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideoaudio, image, text
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest provideraihubmixedenai

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

edenai, huggingface, infomaniak

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Apertus v1.5 70B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 86% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on input price. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 68% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on output price. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 78% cheaper than Apertus v1.5 70B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Apertus v1.5 70B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 262K tokens; Apertus v1.5 70B: 100K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Apertus v1.5 70B?

edenai, huggingface, infomaniak