Qwen3-VL Plus vs ERNIE 5.1: API price and specs
Qwen3-VL Plus is 77% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on input price.
Qwen3-VL Plus is 59% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on output price.
Qwen3-VL Plus is 68% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3-VL Plus has a 104.8% larger context than ERNIE 5.1.
| Field | Qwen3-VL Plus | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.13 | $0.56 +333.4% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.17 | $0.58 +229.1% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.04 | $2.54 +143.8% |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.55 | $2.59 +67.2% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.34 | $1.07 +216.7% |
| Context | 262K | 128K +51.2% |
| Max output | 33K +50% | 66K |
| Providers | 7 | 2 +71.4% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | image, text, video | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | edenai | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-VL Plus or ERNIE 5.1?
Qwen3-VL Plus is 77% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on input price. Qwen3-VL Plus is 59% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on output price. Qwen3-VL Plus is 68% cheaper than ERNIE 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3-VL Plus or ERNIE 5.1?
Qwen3-VL Plus: 262K tokens; ERNIE 5.1: 128K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3-VL Plus and ERNIE 5.1?
aihubmix, zenmux