AI Rate Card

Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Ling-1T: API price and specs

Qwen3 Coder Plus is 5% cheaper than Ling-1T on input price.

Qwen3 Coder Plus is 1% cheaper than Ling-1T on output price.

Qwen3 Coder Plus is 3% cheaper than Ling-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3 Coder Plus has a 719.2% larger context than Ling-1T.

FieldQwen3 Coder PlusLing-1T
Lowest input, per 1M$0.52$0.55 +5.4%
Median input, per 1M$0.80 +44.3%$0.55
Lowest output, per 1M$2.16$2.19 +1.5%
Median output, per 1M$3.80 +71.5%$2.22
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.95$0.99 +3.6%
Context1M128K +87.8%
Max output66K64K +2.3%
Providers102 +80%
Regions——
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providercometapiaihubmix

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Ling-1T?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is 5% cheaper than Ling-1T on input price. Qwen3 Coder Plus is 1% cheaper than Ling-1T on output price. Qwen3 Coder Plus is 3% cheaper than Ling-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Ling-1T?

Qwen3 Coder Plus: 1M tokens; Ling-1T: 128K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3 Coder Plus and Ling-1T?

aihubmix, zenmux