AI Rate Card

Qwen3 32B vs Sonar Pro: API price and specs

Qwen3 32B is 98% cheaper than Sonar Pro on input price.

Qwen3 32B is 99% cheaper than Sonar Pro on output price.

Qwen3 32B is 98% cheaper than Sonar Pro on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Sonar Pro has a 56.2% larger context than Qwen3 32B.

FieldQwen3 32BSonar Pro
Lowest input, per 1M$0.064$3.00 +4587.5%
Median input, per 1M$0.10$3.00 +2784.6%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.22$15.00 +6596.4%
Median output, per 1M$0.45$15.00 +3233.3%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.11$6.00 +5414.7%
Context131K +36%205K
Max output131K8K +93.7%
Providers227 +68.2%
RegionsEU, USUS
Acceptstextimage, text
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerrequestyaiml

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, edenai, fastrouter, helicone, kilo, openrouter, requesty

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Sonar Pro?

Qwen3 32B is 98% cheaper than Sonar Pro on input price. Qwen3 32B is 99% cheaper than Sonar Pro on output price. Qwen3 32B is 98% cheaper than Sonar Pro on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3 32B or Sonar Pro?

Qwen3 32B: 131K tokens; Sonar Pro: 205K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3 32B and Sonar Pro?

aiml, edenai, fastrouter, helicone, kilo, openrouter, requesty