Qwen3 32B vs Particle-1: API price and specs
Particle-1 is 22% cheaper than Qwen3 32B on input price.
Qwen3 32B is 55% cheaper than Particle-1 on output price.
Qwen3 32B is 27% cheaper than Particle-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Particle-1 has a 700% larger context than Qwen3 32B.
| Field | Qwen3 32B | Particle-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.064 +28% | $0.05 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.10 +18.9% | $0.0875 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.22 | $0.50 +123.2% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.45 | $0.50 +11.1% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.11 | $0.15 +37.9% |
| Context | 131K +87.5% | 1M |
| Max output | 131K +0.1% | 131K |
| Providers | 22 | 4 +81.8% |
| Regions | EU, US | US |
| Accepts | text | image, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | requesty | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
kilo, openrouter, requesty, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Particle-1?
Particle-1 is 22% cheaper than Qwen3 32B on input price. Qwen3 32B is 55% cheaper than Particle-1 on output price. Qwen3 32B is 27% cheaper than Particle-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 32B or Particle-1?
Qwen3 32B: 131K tokens; Particle-1: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 32B and Particle-1?
kilo, openrouter, requesty, vercel