AI Rate Card

Qwen3 32B vs Mercury 2: API price and specs

Qwen3 32B is 74% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price.

Qwen3 32B is 70% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price.

Qwen3 32B is 73% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3 32B has a 2.4% larger context than Mercury 2.

FieldQwen3 32BMercury 2
Lowest input, per 1M$0.064$0.25 +290.6%
Median input, per 1M$0.10$0.25 +140.4%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.22$0.75 +234.8%
Median output, per 1M$0.45$0.75 +66.7%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.11$0.40 +267.6%
Context131K128K +2.3%
Max output131K128K +2.3%
Providers226 +72.7%
RegionsEU, USUS
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerrequestyinception

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Mercury 2?

Qwen3 32B is 74% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price. Qwen3 32B is 70% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price. Qwen3 32B is 73% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3 32B or Mercury 2?

Qwen3 32B: 131K tokens; Mercury 2: 128K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3 32B and Mercury 2?

aiml, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel