Qwen3 14B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: API price and specs
Qwen3 14B is 98% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on input price.
Qwen3 14B is 94% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on output price.
Qwen3 14B is 97% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3 14B has a 699.5% larger context than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k.
| Field | Qwen3 14B | OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.07 | $3.00 +4185.7% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.12 | $3.00 +2400% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.23 | $4.00 +1654.4% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.24 | $4.00 +1566.7% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.12 | $3.80 +3187.2% |
| Context | 131K | 16K +87.5% |
| Max output | 131K | 4K +96.9% |
| Providers | 12 | 5 +58.3% |
| Regions | EU, US | US |
| Accepts | text | pdf, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | siliconflow | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, edenai, fastrouter, kilo, openrouter
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?
Qwen3 14B is 98% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on input price. Qwen3 14B is 94% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on output price. Qwen3 14B is 97% cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 14B or OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?
Qwen3 14B: 131K tokens; OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: 16K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 14B and OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?
aihubmix, edenai, fastrouter, kilo, openrouter