AI Rate CardQwen 2.5 72B Instruct vs LFM2.5 2.6B: API price and specs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 34% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on input price.
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 20% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on output price.
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 31% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct | LFM2.5 2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.23 | $0.35 +52.2% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.36 +2.9% | $0.35 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.50 +25% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.50 +25% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.31 | $0.45 +45.2% |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 8K +50% |
| Providers | 11 | 3 +72.7% |
| Regions | US | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | requesty | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or LFM2.5 2.6B?
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 34% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on input price. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 20% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on output price. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 31% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or LFM2.5 2.6B?
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct: 131K tokens; LFM2.5 2.6B: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and LFM2.5 2.6B?
aihubmix, kilo, openrouter