AI Rate Card

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct vs granite-4.2-3b: API price and specs

granite-4.2-3b is 87% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price.

granite-4.2-3b is 70% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on output price.

granite-4.2-3b is 83% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

FieldQwen 2.5 72B Instructgranite-4.2-3b
Lowest input, per 1M$0.23 +666.7%$0.03
Median input, per 1M$0.36 +1100%$0.03
Lowest output, per 1M$0.40 +233.3%$0.12
Median output, per 1M$0.40 +233.3%$0.12
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.31 +474.1%$0.054
Context131K131K
Max output16K—
Providers113 +72.7%
RegionsUSUS
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerrequestydeepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

deepinfra, edenai, huggingface

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or granite-4.2-3b?

granite-4.2-3b is 87% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price. granite-4.2-3b is 70% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on output price. granite-4.2-3b is 83% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or granite-4.2-3b?

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct: 131K tokens; granite-4.2-3b: 131K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and granite-4.2-3b?

deepinfra, edenai, huggingface