AI Rate CardQwen Plus vs llama-3-70b: API price and specs
Qwen Plus is 84% cheaper than llama-3-70b on input price.
Qwen Plus is 69% cheaper than llama-3-70b on output price.
Qwen Plus is 81% cheaper than llama-3-70b on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen Plus | llama-3-70b |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.11 | $0.70 +521.7% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.26 | $1.80 +591.3% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.29 | $0.94 +223.2% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.78 | $1.80 +130.4% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.17 | $0.89 +420.2% |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Providers | 9 | 2 +77.8% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | text | — |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or llama-3-70b?
Qwen Plus is 84% cheaper than llama-3-70b on input price. Qwen Plus is 69% cheaper than llama-3-70b on output price. Qwen Plus is 81% cheaper than llama-3-70b on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Where can I use both Qwen Plus and llama-3-70b?
aihubmix, aiml