Qwen Plus vs llama-2-7b: API price and specs
llama-2-7b is 11% cheaper than Qwen Plus on input price.
llama-2-7b is 66% cheaper than Qwen Plus on output price.
llama-2-7b is 30% cheaper than Qwen Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen Plus | llama-2-7b |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.11 +12.6% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.26 +67.7% | $0.15 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.29 +190% | $0.10 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.78 +403.2% | $0.15 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.17 +42.2% | $0.12 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Providers | 9 | 2 +77.8% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | text | — |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or llama-2-7b?
llama-2-7b is 11% cheaper than Qwen Plus on input price. llama-2-7b is 66% cheaper than Qwen Plus on output price. llama-2-7b is 30% cheaper than Qwen Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Where can I use both Qwen Plus and llama-2-7b?
aihubmix, aiml