AI Rate CardQwen Plus vs LFM2.5 2.6B: API price and specs
Qwen Plus is 68% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on input price.
Qwen Plus is 42% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on output price.
Qwen Plus is 62% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen Plus has a 700% larger context than LFM2.5 2.6B.
| Field | Qwen Plus | LFM2.5 2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.11 | $0.35 +210.8% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.26 | $0.35 +34.6% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.29 | $0.50 +72.4% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.78 +56% | $0.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.17 | $0.45 +163.8% |
| Context | 1M | 131K +87.5% |
| Max output | 33K | 8K +75% |
| Providers | 9 | 3 +66.7% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or LFM2.5 2.6B?
Qwen Plus is 68% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on input price. Qwen Plus is 42% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on output price. Qwen Plus is 62% cheaper than LFM2.5 2.6B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen Plus or LFM2.5 2.6B?
Qwen Plus: 1M tokens; LFM2.5 2.6B: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen Plus and LFM2.5 2.6B?
aihubmix, kilo, openrouter