Qwen MT Plus vs CoBuddy: API price and specs
Qwen MT Plus is 81% cheaper than CoBuddy on input price.
Qwen MT Plus is 63% cheaper than CoBuddy on output price.
Qwen MT Plus is 73% cheaper than CoBuddy on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
CoBuddy has a 700% larger context than Qwen MT Plus.
| Field | Qwen MT Plus | CoBuddy |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.05275 | $0.28 +430.8% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.26 | $0.29 +10.7% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.42 | $1.13 +167.8% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.78 | $1.16 +48.9% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.14 | $0.51 +268.9% |
| Context | 16K +87.5% | 131K |
| Max output | 8K +87.5% | 66K |
| Providers | 6 | 2 +66.7% |
| Regions | GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | trustedrouter | novita |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen MT Plus or CoBuddy?
Qwen MT Plus is 81% cheaper than CoBuddy on input price. Qwen MT Plus is 63% cheaper than CoBuddy on output price. Qwen MT Plus is 73% cheaper than CoBuddy on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen MT Plus or CoBuddy?
Qwen MT Plus: 16K tokens; CoBuddy: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen MT Plus and CoBuddy?
novita, trustedrouter