AI Rate CardQwen Max vs llama-2-7b: API price and specs
llama-2-7b is 71% cheaper than Qwen Max on input price.
llama-2-7b is 93% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price.
llama-2-7b is 81% cheaper than Qwen Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen Max | llama-2-7b |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.35 +247.8% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.71 +358.1% | $0.15 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.38 +1280% | $0.10 |
| Median output, per 1M | $2.84 +1732.3% | $0.15 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.62 +419.9% | $0.12 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Providers | 7 | 2 +71.4% |
| Regions | GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | text | — |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | qiniu-ai | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or llama-2-7b?
llama-2-7b is 71% cheaper than Qwen Max on input price. llama-2-7b is 93% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price. llama-2-7b is 81% cheaper than Qwen Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Where can I use both Qwen Max and llama-2-7b?
aihubmix, aiml