AI Rate Card

Aion-3.0 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: API price and specs

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 99% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on input price.

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 97% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on output price.

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 98% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Aion-3.0 has a 1500% larger context than Hy-MT2-1.8B.

FieldAion-3.0Hy-MT2-1.8B
Lowest input, per 1M$3.00 +6718.2%$0.044
Median input, per 1M$3.08 +6905.7%$0.044
Lowest output, per 1M$6.00 +3289.8%$0.18
Median output, per 1M$6.17 +3383.1%$0.18
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$4.20 +5189.7%$0.0794
Context131K8K +93.8%
Max output33K4K +87.5%
Providers43 +25%
Regions——
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerkilokilo

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, kilo, openrouter

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 99% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on input price. Hy-MT2-1.8B is 97% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on output price. Hy-MT2-1.8B is 98% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Aion-3.0 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Aion-3.0: 131K tokens; Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8K tokens.

Where can I use both Aion-3.0 and Hy-MT2-1.8B?

aiml, kilo, openrouter