Aion-3.0 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: API price and specs
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 72% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on input price.
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 86% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on output price.
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 76% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Aion-3.0 | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $3.00 +252.9% | $0.85 |
| Median input, per 1M | $3.08 +262.6% | $0.85 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $6.00 +605.9% | $0.85 |
| Median output, per 1M | $6.17 +625.3% | $0.85 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $4.20 +311.8% | $1.02 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K +50% |
| Providers | 4 | 3 +25% |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | kilo | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 72% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on input price. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 86% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on output price. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 76% cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Aion-3.0 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?
Aion-3.0: 131K tokens; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Aion-3.0 and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?
aiml, kilo, openrouter