AI Rate CardAion-2.0 vs ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview: API price and specs
ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 88% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on input price.
ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 81% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on output price.
ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 86% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview has a 700% larger context than Aion-2.0.
| Field | Aion-2.0 | ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.80 +700% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.82 +428.6% | $0.16 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.60 +433.3% | $0.30 |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.64 +252.4% | $0.47 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $1.12 +600% | $0.16 |
| Context | 131K +87.5% | 1M |
| Max output | 33K +75% | 131K |
| Providers | 4 | 2 +50% |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | kilo | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Aion-2.0 or ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview?
ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 88% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on input price. ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 81% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on output price. ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview is 86% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Aion-2.0 or ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview?
Aion-2.0: 131K tokens; ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Aion-2.0 and ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview?
kilo, trustedrouter