AI Rate CardAion-2.0 vs Saba: API price and specs
Saba is 75% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on input price.
Saba is 62% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on output price.
Saba is 71% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Aion-2.0 has a 300% larger context than Saba.
| Field | Aion-2.0 | Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.80 +300% | $0.20 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.82 +311% | $0.20 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.60 +166.7% | $0.60 |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.64 +174% | $0.60 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $1.12 +250% | $0.32 |
| Context | 131K | 33K +75% |
| Max output | 33K | 26K +20% |
| Providers | 4 | 3 +25% |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | text | file, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | kilo | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Aion-2.0 or Saba?
Saba is 75% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on input price. Saba is 62% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on output price. Saba is 71% cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Aion-2.0 or Saba?
Aion-2.0: 131K tokens; Saba: 33K tokens.
Where can I use both Aion-2.0 and Saba?
aiml, kilo, openrouter